Prologue
Sometime in August 2011, I decided to upgrade to a sedan. I was nearing 70,000 kms in the Getz. It had gracefully aged seven years already and the regular maintainence expenses were going up steadily. While the car was a great drive, I realized some of it’s handling and braking inabilities on a long road trip. And Hyundai’s famed ‘boat suspension’ was always a pain point.
So I started with my requirements:
- A car that is fun to drive (i.e. responsive but refined engine, with oodles of power on-the-tap) in city as well as on highways.
- Stable and planted at high speeds, with good steering feedback and braking.
- Good suspesion, as some of my road trips involve remote locations.
- Comfortable interiors and seats, especially back and lumbar support. I was not looking for gizmos or gadgetry. I had plans to ICE up the car to the T anyway. And everything else can be done after-market.
- Budget – upto Rs. 10 lacs
Honestly for me, it did not start with the usual ‘Petrol vs Diesel’ debate. I’m a petrol head as far as I can remember and a bit averse to diesel cars . My monthly running (~1200 kms, mostly city driving) also did not compel me to think against a petrol. Yes, my road trip hobby is an expensive one cosidering the petrol prices and the distances I travel. But then, highways are also more fun in a petrol than a diesel! With this in mind, I started evaluating my options.
As the folklore goes, a test drive is essential to nail down your choice. So I started making calls to dealerships to schedule drives. I encountered funny responses (e.g. Hyundai asked me “why I wish to TD such a hot selling car when people are booking it based on its looks alone”) and some dead serious ones (VW took down so many details that I felt it was an FBI screening). To ensure a standardised test, I drove all cars on the same stretch of road (~5 kms), at the same time (so that traffic intensity would be same) and had the same load (driver+2 passengers) on board. In order to test the high speed / cruising ability, I took all cars for a round trip on the Bandra Worli Sea Link. Those two weeks of test drive were quite literally a game changer for me. Here’s a run down of what I experienced and learnt:
Volkswagen Vento
I don’t know why but I was smitten by the understated looks of the Vento right from the time it was launched. And I had always heard my father praise VW since his Germany days. So it was on top of my list. Had I not test driven this car, I would have bought it, such was my fascination and the hype that they had generated.
But Vento actually proved to be the biggest let down of the lot.
The TD car had around 20,000 kms on the clock and was making more noises than a baby’s rattle. Every mechanical component could be individually heard at the slightest behest – braking, going over speed breakers, turning the steering and what have you. To top this, the well attired salesman’s ‘I-care-a-damn-attitude’ was downright rude (he was perennially on his BBM throughout the TD and had no clear answers to technical questions other than Uhm/Err/Hmm/Yups). Sample this – When questioned about the rattling and poor suspension, his answer was “it’s a 20k kms run car. What else do you expect?” We moved on. Disappointed, but having learnt a crucial lesson in life – always test drive a car thoroughly.
(On a side note – I was a bit surprised to see that VW had skimped so much in sprucing up the car from inside. Even the top end model was plain jane, save for the chrome trims. The interiors were strictly average and definitely showed signs of severe cost restraint)
Hyundai Fluidic Verna
The New Verna had been recently launched and I was tempted to have a look. The photos and specs looked promising. However, this proved to be the second major disappointment. Having owned a Getz before, I was expecting the familiar soft suspension. While this was present, what was shocking was the lack of steering feel and feedback. At 80-100 kmph on the BWSL, the steering literally felt disconnected from the car. It felt very unsafe to be in the driver’s seat. I did not have the confidence to overtake and most of my concentration was on keeping the car in a straight line. Braking was also not taut. For the highways, this was a major concern and I felt this is just not right for me. The other negative point was the extremely low-height rear bench. During the TD, I felt nauseated sitting so low. And since my parents would be the ones using the rear bench, I decided against FV.
Ford Fiesta
Sadly, the Fiesta did not make it to the long-list. Only because my better half has never liked American cars. In fact she is so averse to American cars that she did not even let me TD this one. I have only heard good stories about it’s handling but sadly, this car was never meant to be for me.
All New Honda City
We had a sort of comfort factor in the fact that if nothing works out, there is always a fall back option in the form of India’s Populist Choice. Little did we know that this would be only car to be rejected even without a TD! We checked it out at the showroom and felt it wasn’t offering anything great. My parents own an NHC and I’m well aware of the car’s drive and handling. But the biggest deal breaker for me was the low height in the ANHC. I frequently banged and scraped my head getting in and out. I’m all of 5’10’’ and felt claustrophobic inside the car. The whole package did not seem value-for-money as well because several key features were available only on the top-end version. I particularly disliked the look of it’s interiors. This was a no-go. In hindsight, it was a wise decision. The bombardment of ANHCs in the last few months (since the price reduction) has made it a mass market sedan and I hate to be one amongst the crowd.
The Dark Horse – Fiat Linea T-Jet
As you might have noticed, Linea was not in my original list. Like most other Indians, I had heard horror stories of pathetic after sales service and over-priced spare parts. Add poor fuel efficiency to the mix and you obviously would not consider the car. However, I had also heard my girl praise the safety, handling and drive of her (ex) Palio many times. As luck would have it, we were passing by a Fiat showroom and just for the heck of it, we decided to check out the famed Punto.
But once we entered and saw a Linea T-Jet we were blown away. It was a Sun Beam Beige color (exclusive to T-Jet) and had a dedicated showroom space to it. We sat in the car and I was mighty impressed by what I saw and more importantly, by what I ‘felt’. It was oozing premium-ness from all possible corners. The salesman came over quickly and started explaining the features. Point after point, I was salivating at the prospect of owning this car. I promptly booked a test drive.
What I loved most was the fact that T-Jet has its basics (engine, suspension, drive, safety features, braking) stongly in place. To my mind, these are it’s USPs. All other features (Auto AC/Climate control, all leather interiors, steering remote control, large boot etc) are just bonus, nice-to-haves for this car. On the other hand, such features are exactly what are being pitched as USPs of the other three contenders! See the difference?